“If you can cross back into Canada with the RCMP and have no problems, why can’t you cross back at an actual port of entry and have a CBSA officer say the same thing? There has to be consistencies in situations like this,” he said.ĬTV News reached out to CBSA and was told that the agency does not provide comment on specific travellers, but picking up a pet from the United States is considered optional travel, and thus subject to mandatory quarantine rules. Saunders said it’s good the RCMP is keeping track, but that there should be uniform treatment by both government agencies. They are regularly checking identification for anyone returning north and looking at what returning Canadians are bringing with them. RCMP officers are now patrolling 0 Avenue, near entry points for Peace Arch Park. “From what I see, absolutely nobody, when they walk north back into Canada from the American side of the Peace Arch Park, is quarantined.” He said he regularly meets clients at the park. “For them to determine that she is subject to this 14-day quarantine is ridiculous,” he told CTV News. Her immigration attorney Len Saunders agrees. “It was a meeting of five minutes and yet I’ve been quarantined – in my opinion and I think most people’s opinion – for no reason,” she said. She just didn’t anticipate being told she’d have to quarantine when she got there. That’s where Heinbach was: at the park getting her dog for just a few minutes before planning to return home. Families continue to meet there on weekends. government closed the Canadian side of the park earlier this year – citing concerns about gatherings during the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason – but the U.S. Peace Arch Park is a shared space operated by both Canada and the U.S., and Canadians and Americans have long been allowed to mingle there without crossing an international border. “(I) said I was bringing my dog back into Canada and was promptly quarantined.” “I went to the CBSA office and did the right thing,” she said. Heinbach told CTV News Vancouver an RCMP officer told them to claim the dog with CBSA at the north side of the park. That vet is located in Blaine, where her husband lives, and the pair have been separated since the border restrictions first came into effect. “So, she was there to get vaccinated against rabies.” “We have 3 dogs and they all have the same veterinarian,” Heinbach explained. If the legislative branch is in line with Trump's executive actions, they may prove difficult to challenge in court.Birgit Heinbach went to see her American husband on her birthday at Peace Arch Park to retrieve their dog. Mandel, the Court ruled that the White House could implement immigration restrictions if it had "facially legitimate and bona fide" reasons for doing so.Ĭongress, moreover, commands a great deal of power over US immigration policy. Legal precedent has some scholars and Trump critics worried that the Supreme Court may uphold the refugee ban because it falls within the boundaries of immigration law. The American Civil Liberties Union has signaled that it will sue the Trump Administration, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations has done the same, saying that Trump's reasoning involves a "religious motive" that is unconstitutional. "We have filed an emergency motion to prevent the US government from sending our clients, and people like them, from being sent back to countries where they will be in danger." That, Doss argued, would be "a violation of international law." Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |